Data from: Dealing with assumptions and sampling bias in the estimation of effective population size: A case study in an amphibian population

Dataset

Description

genotypes_eggs_moor_frog.csv: the microsatellite genotypes of Rana arvalis eggs collected in Klein Schietveld, Belgium in March 2017. The multilocus genotypes for 13 microsatellite markers of 729 R. arvalis eggs collected from 366 clutches in 25 breeding patches. In the first five columns the following information is provided: the sample ID, the ID of the breeding patch, the egg clutch ID, followed by the coordinates of the breeding patch (Belgian Lambert 72 coordinate system). The next 13 columns represent the different microsatellite markers with the loci names mentioned in the column headers. Alleles are separated by a forward slash. Missing genotypes are indicated with “NA/NA”.

Abstract

Accurately estimating effective population size (Ne) is essential for understanding evolutionary processes and guiding conservation efforts. This study investigates Ne estimation methods in spatially structured populations using a population of moor frog (Rana arvalis) as a case study. We assessed the behaviour of Ne estimates derived from the linkage disequilibrium (LD) method as we changed the spatial configuration of samples. Moor frog eggs were sampled from 25 breeding patches (i.e., separate vernal ponds, ditches or parts of larger fens) within a single population, revealing an isolation-by-distance pattern and a local spatial genetic structure. Varying buffer sizes around each patch were used to examine the impact of sampling window size on the estimation of effective number of breeders (Nb). Our results indicate a downward bias in LD Nb estimates with increasing buffer size, suggesting an underestimation of Nb. The observed bias is attributed to LD resulting from including genetically divergent individuals (mixture-LD) confounding LD due to drift. This emphasises the significance of considering even subtle spatial genetic patterns. The implications of these findings are discussed, emphasising the need to account for spatial genetic structure to accurately assess population viability and inform conservation efforts. This study contributes to our understanding of the challenges associated with Ne estimation in spatially structured populations and underscores the importance of refining methodologies to address population-specific spatial dynamics for effective conservation planning and management.
Date made availableSept-2024
Temporal coverage2017
Date of data production2017 -
Geographical coverageKlein Schietveld

Thematic List 2020

  • Protected nature

Taxonomic list

  • amphibians (Amphibia)
  • frogs and toads (Anura)
  • Rana arvalis
  • moor frog

Policy

  • Habitats Directive
  • local conservation status

Geographic list

  • Kempen
  • Klein Schietveld

Technological

  • genetic technologies
  • statistics and modelling
  • fieldwork (observations and sampling)

Free keywords

  • microsatellites
  • eggs
  • effective population size
  • linkage disequilibrium
  • spatially structured population
  • neighbourhood size
  • sibship

Cite this