Research into the management of Invasive Alien Species

Keyphrases

1. Invasive Species 100%
2. Europe 60%
3. Invasive Species Management 55%
4. Branta Canadensis 48%
5. Cost-benefit Analysis 48%
6. Canada Goose 48%
7. Belgium 48%
8. Flanders 48%
9. Biological Invasions 48%
10. Neovison Vison 32%
11. COVID-19 32%
12. American Mink 32%
13. Potential Risk 32%
14. Damage Costs 24%
15. Discount Rate 24%
16. Business-as-usual Scenario 24%
17. Management Costs 24%
18. Capture Rate 24%
19. Control Actions 22%
20. Scenario Approach 16%
21. Future Management 16%
22. Management Measures 16%
23. Local Managers 16%
24. Survey-based 16%
25. Management Trends 16%
26. Social-economic Impact 12%
27. Logistic Growth 12%
28. Egg Destruction 12%
29. Water Eutrophication 12%
30. Social-ecological Impacts 12%
31. Avoided Cost 12%
32. Premolt 12%
33. Cultivated Grassland 12%
34. Coordinated Hunting 12%
35. Avoided Damage Costs 12%
36. Bioeconomic Model 12%
37. Water Damage 12%
38. Population Growth 12%
39. Ecological Economics 12%
40. Economic Impact 12%
41. Eutrophication 12%
42. Socio-economic Impact 12%
43. European Level 12%
44. Management Strategy 12%
45. Shared Socioeconomic Pathways 10%
46. European Countries 9%
47. Monitoring System 9%
48. Downscaling 9%
49. Population Data 8%
50. Health Interest 8%
51. Source Resolution 8%
52. Threats to Conservation 8%
53. Virus 8%
54. Control Scheme 8%
55. Control Plan 8%
56. Feral Population 8%
57. Harmonized Data 8%
58. Western European Countries 8%
59. Mink Farming 8%
60. Density Index 8%
61. Existence of Control 8%
62. Susceptible Host 8%
63. Capture Effort 8%
64. Lack of Information 8%
65. Eradication Therapy 8%
66. Spain 8%
67. Wildlife Species 8%
68. Spatial Resolution 8%
69. Risk Assessment 8%
70. Scenario Variables 8%
71. Competing Interests 8%
72. Biosecurity 8%
73. Alien Species 8%
74. Global Scenario 6%
75. Nature's Contributions to People 5%
76. Article 17 5%
77. Article 15 5%
78. January 2015 5%
79. Scientific Assessment 5%
80. European Regulation 5%
81. Scenario Space 5%
82. Social-ecological Drivers 5%
83. Socioeconomic Sectors 5%
84. Integrative Approach 5%