A general purpose genotype in an ancient asexual

K Van Doninck, I Schön, Luc De Bruyn, K Martens

    Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-article

    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Many parthenogenetic species are geographically more widely distributed than their sexual relatives. Their success has been partly attributed to the existence of general purpose genotypes (GPGs). Darwinula stevensoni is an ostracod species, which has persisted for >25 million years without sex, and is both ubiquitous and cosmopolitan. Here, we test the hypothesis that this ancient asexual species may possess a highly generalised (or general purpose) genotype. The ecological tolerance of D. stevensoni was compared with asexual populations of Heterocypris incongruens, a common cypridinid species with mixed reproduction, as well as with that of another ancient asexual darwinulid species with a limited geographic and ecological distribution, Vestalenula molopoensis. The unusually wide tolerance range for both salinity (0-30 g/l) and temperature (10°C, 20°C and 30°C) of the freshwater species D. stevensoni, supports the hypothesis that this ancient asexual has indeed developed a GPG. This coincides with its wide geographic and ecological distribution and might explain its persistence as an obligate asexual in its long-term evolution. The more restricted salinity tolerance of V. molopoensis (maximum at 12 g/l) shows that not all species of the ancient asexual family Darwinulidae have a GPG. D. stevensoni has a much broader tolerance than the asexuals of H. incongruens. We argue why a GPG is most likely to develop in long-term asexuals.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalOecologia
    Volume132
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)205-212
    Number of pages8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Thematic list

    • Fauna

    EWI Biomedical sciences

    • B280-animal-ecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A general purpose genotype in an ancient asexual'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this