Behavioral responses of predatory flies of the genus Medetera Fischer von Waldheim (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) and the tree-killing beetle Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) to odor compound blends

Key Message Medetera (Fischer von Waldheim) flies, natural enemies of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.), were attracted to synthetic blends of compounds produced by infested spruce trees. A subset of trapped specimens revealed sixteen Medetera species. Most abundant were M. signaticornis, M. infumata, and M. prjachinae. Only blends containing beetle-produced compounds significantly attracted Medetera spp. and I. typographus. Context Fly species of the genus Medetera (Fischer von Waldheim) (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) represent one of the most important groups of natural enemies of the Eurasian bark beetle Ips typographus (L.), which infests Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. In a previous study, we showed that adult Medetera flies exploit semiochemicals to find beetle-infested trees however, the exact nature of those attractive compounds has not yet been determined. Aims The aim of this follow-up study was to investigate the behavioral responses of Medetera spp. and I. typographus, to different combinations of semiochemicals. Methods In this study, 22 volatile compounds identified from I. typographus-infested Norway spruce were divided into five groups (A-E) based on being primarily produced by the bark beetle I. typographus (group A), bark beetle-associated microorganisms (groups B and C), or spruce tree (groups D and E). The effect of the compounds in these groups in the attraction of Medetera species and I. typographus was tested in two different subtractive field trapping assays. Results In the first subtractive assay, the full blend (ABCDE), and the blends lacking microbial compounds of group C, or spruce tree compounds of group D led to significant attraction of Medetera flies. Morphological identification of a subset of the specimens collected revealed that sixteen species were attracted to the synthetic blends, with M. signaticornis Loew being the most abundant. In the second subtractive assay, high attraction of Medetera flies and I. typographus was found for a 12-component synthetic blend. Conclusion The insights gained provide a basis for developing synthetic attractants to facilitate monitoring of Medetera flies. Future testing and optimization of these attractants will enhance our ability to monitor, conserve and utilize Medetera flies, thereby enabling us to better protect forests from the damaging effects of spruce bark beetles.