Effects of body size on sex-related migration vary between two closely related gull species with similar size dimorphism

D. S Bosman, H. J. P Vercruijsse, Eric Stienen, M Vincx, L De Neve, L Lens

    Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

    13 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Studies of migration have revealed multiple trade-offs with other life-history traits that may underlie observed variation in migratory properties among ages and sexes. To assess whether, and to what extent, body size and/or sex-specific differences in competition for resources (e.g. breeding territories or winter food) may shape variation in migration distance and timing of arrival in ecologically and phylogenetically related species, we combined over 30 000 sightings of individually marked, sexually mature males and females of Herring Gulls Larus argentatus and Lesser Black-Backed Gulls Larus fuscus with biometric measurements and phenological observations at a mixed breeding colony. In L. argentatus, larger males migrated further from the breeding colony, whereas migration distance was independent of body size in adult females. In L. fuscus, no relationship between body size and migration distance was apparent in either sex. Mean arrival dates at the breeding colony did not vary with migration distances but differed between males and females of L. argentatus (but not L. fuscus). As allometry at least partly explains sexual segregation in migration behaviour in L. argentatus, but not in L. fuscus, we conclude that the effect of body size on sex-related migratory strategies may vary between closely related, sympatric species despite similar size dimorphism.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalIbis
    Volume154
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)52-60
    Number of pages9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Thematic list

    • Sea and coastal birds

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of body size on sex-related migration vary between two closely related gull species with similar size dimorphism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this