Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Habitat selection of three gull species in response to sudden changes in human mobility

  • Robert Patchett
  • , Brian J. Smith
  • , Chris B. Thaxter
  • , Niall H. K. Burton
  • , Björn H. Franke
  • , Scott W. Yanco
  • , Ruth Y. Oliver
  • , Diego Ellis-Soto
  • , Marlee A. Tucker
  • , Alexandra Loveridge
  • , Julia Sommerfeld
  • , Federico Ossi
  • , Gary D. Clewley
  • , Kees C. J. Camphuysen
  • , Peter Desmet
  • , Raül Ramos
  • , Jacob González-Solís
  • , Ros M. W. Green
  • , Elizabeth M. Humphreys
  • , Daniel T. Johnston
  • Luc Lens, Wendt Müller, Nina J. O'Hanlon, Frédéric Robin, Ángel Sallent, Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Eric W. M. Stienen, Frederick Verbruggen, Christian Rutz

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

Abstract

Developing robust strategies for human–wildlife coexistence is hampered by our limited understanding of how humans impact animal space use. It is challenging to measure the relative effects of landscape modification and human mobility on wildlife, since these factors are typically confounded. The extreme change in human mobility levels that occurred during COVID-19 lockdowns provided an opportunity to disentangle these impacts. Many gull species are considered urban adapters, capable of roosting, foraging and breeding near humans in highly modified environments. We predicted that lockdown-induced changes in human mobility would affect gulls’ selection for urban and beach habitats because of altered disturbance levels and food availability. We analysed GPS tracking data from 113 individual gulls over multiple years (2015–2022), across three species in western Europe (herring gull Larus argentatus, lesser black-backed gull L. fuscus and yellow-legged gull L. michahellis). We found that, during lockdowns, selection for urban areas increased in two of ten colonies and selection for beaches increased in one colony and decreased in two others. This heterogeneous pattern likely reflects differences in how gull populations respond to opportunities and challenges presented by human-modified landscapes. Understanding this context dependence is emerging as a priority for coordinated efforts to promote sustainable human–wildlife coexistence.
Original languageEnglish
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B
Volume292
Issue number2061
ISSN0962-8452
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17-Dec-2025

Thematic List 2020

  • Flora & fauna
  • Nature & society

Taxonomic list

  • gulls and terns (Laridae and Sternidae)

Policy

  • social aspects of forest and nature
  • public health

Cite this