TY - JOUR
T1 - Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe
AU - Sabatini, Francesco M.
AU - Keeton, William S.
AU - Lindner, Marcus
AU - Svoboda, Miroslav
AU - Verkerk, Pieter J.
AU - Bauhus, Jürgen
AU - Bruelheide, Helge
AU - Burrascano, Sabina
AU - Debaive, Nicolas
AU - Duarte, Inês
AU - Garbarino, Matteo
AU - Grigoriadis, Nikolaos
AU - Lombardi, Fabio
AU - Mikoláš, Martin
AU - Meyer, Peter
AU - Motta, Renzo
AU - Mozgeris, Gintautas
AU - Nunes, Leónia
AU - Ódor, Péter
AU - Panayotov, Momchil
AU - Ruete, Alejandro
AU - Simovski, Bojan
AU - Stillhard, Jonas
AU - Svensson, Johan
AU - Szwagrzyk, Jerzy
AU - Tikkanen, Olli-Pekka
AU - Vandekerkhove, Kris
AU - Volosyanchuk, Roman
AU - Vrska, Tomas
AU - Zlatanov, Tzvetan
AU - Kuemmerle, Tobias
PY - 2020/9/15
Y1 - 2020/9/15
N2 - Abstract Aims Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible. Location Europe. Methods We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe's forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection. Results We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two-thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non-primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities. Main conclusion Europe's primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU's “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike.
AB - Abstract Aims Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible. Location Europe. Methods We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe's forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection. Results We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two-thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non-primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities. Main conclusion Europe's primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU's “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike.
U2 - 10.1111/ddi.13158
DO - 10.1111/ddi.13158
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
SN - 1366-9516
VL - 26
SP - 1646
EP - 1662
JO - Diversity and Distributions
JF - Diversity and Distributions
IS - n/a
ER -