Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The role of social, policy and economic forces in shaping forest restoration practices in Europe

  • Maitane Erdozain
  • , Iciar Alberdi
  • , Réka Aszalós
  • , Kurt Bollmann
  • , Vassilis Detsis
  • , Jurij Diaci
  • , Martina Đodan
  • , Georgios Efthimiou
  • , László Gálhidy
  • , Marie Haase
  • , Johanna Hoffmann
  • , Delphine Jaymond
  • , Elisabeth Johann
  • , Henrik Jørgensen
  • , Frank Krumm
  • , Timo Kuuluvainen
  • , Thibault Lachat
  • , Katharina Lapin
  • , Marcus Lindner
  • , Palle Madsen
  • Liviu Nichiforel, Maciej Pach, Yoan Paillet, Ciprian Palaghianu, Jordi Palau, Jesús Pemán, Sanja Perić, Susanne Raum, Silvio Schüler, Jerzy Skrzyszewski, Johan Svensson, Sander Teeuwen, Giorgio Vacchiano, Kris Vandekerkhove, Isabel Cañellas, María Menéndez-Miguélez, Leland Warden, Simon Fleckenstein, Metodi Sotirov, Moses Kazungu, Marcel Hunziker, Luc De Keersmaeker, Aitor Àvila Callau, Sergio de-Miguel

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

Abstract

Forest restoration in Europe has a complex history strongly influenced by various social, policy and economic factors. Understanding these influences is essential for shaping effective restoration strategies and avoiding past mistakes, particularly in light of meeting ambitious targets outlined in initiatives such as the EU Nature Restoration Regulation. Here we identify the key social, policy and economic drivers, barriers and enablers that have historically shaped forest restoration across Europe. We analyzed and synthesized detailed information from historical national narratives on forest restoration provided by experts from 18 European countries. Our work details how wars, changes in governance (centralization vs. decentralization) and forest tenure (privatization vs. nationalization), different policy instruments (regulatory, financial, persuasive and organizational), market fluctuations and sociodemographic changes (e.g., rural abandonment, changes in public opinion) have driven the development of forest restoration in Europe. The findings underscore the need to use inclusive and innovative governance mechanisms to reconcile diverging societal paradigms (e.g., rural vs. urban, conservation vs. forestry) partly reflected in incoherent forest-related policies, as well as to address the fragmentation resulting from forest privatization. Ensuring stable funding mechanisms (e.g., remuneration systems for forest ecosystem services) alongside favorable regulatory frameworks will also be key for successful large-scale forest restoration efforts. Policy recommendations are made to ensure the effective implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Regulation, including a hybrid governance model that balances strong national regulatory frameworks with local adaptability to diverse socioecological contexts, integrating socioeconomic metrics, strengthening public engagement, and leveraging market-based and green tax incentives.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume161
ISSN0264-8377
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27-Nov-2025

Thematic List 2020

  • Forest

Policy

  • forest and agriculture policy
  • woodland protection

Geographic list

  • Europe

Cite this