Overslaan naar hoofdnavigatie Overslaan naar zoeken Overslaan naar hoofdinhoud

Assessing the success of a horizon scanning approach in predicting invasive non-native species arrival

  • Jodey M. Peyton
  • , Stephanie Rorke
  • , David C. Aldridge
  • , Oliver L. Pescott
  • , Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz
  • , David G. Noble
  • , Jack Sewell
  • , Alan J. A. Stewart
  • , Tim Adriaens
  • , Björn C. Beckmann
  • , J. Robert Britton
  • , Juliet Brodie
  • , Peter M. J. Brown
  • , Imogen C. N. Cavadino
  • , Paul F. Clark
  • , Alison M. Dunn
  • , Jim Foster
  • , Colin Harrower
  • , Martin C. Harvey
  • , Michelle C. Jackson
  • Tomos Jones, Christine A. Maggs, Gabrielle Martin, Fiona Mathews, Aileen C. Mill, Debbie Murphy, Ellie Paganini, Robin Payne, Wolfgang Rabitsch, Trevor Renals, Karsten Schönrogge, Richard H. Shaw, Graham C. Smith, Paul D. Stebbing, Pete A. Stroh, Hannah Tidbury, Elena Tricarico, Jeanne Vallet, Kevin J. Walker, Louisa E. Wood, Christine A. Wood, Ben Woodcock, Helen E. Roy

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftA1: Web of Science-artikelpeer review

Uittreksel

Abstract Despite increasing awareness of invasive non-native species (INNS) and enhanced biosecurity controls in many countries, INNS are still arriving and establishing in new destinations, remaining a globally acknowledged threat to native biodiversity. Preventing the introduction of INNS, as opposed to controlling them once they have arrived, is recognised as the most effective approach to their management. Horizon scanning represents one of the key tools to identify high-risk INNS that have yet to arrive within a region and has been applied in many contexts around the world, but to date there have been no studies that systematically assess the effectiveness of this approach. Here, we revisit the horizon scan for Great Britain conducted in 2013 that assessed the likelihood of high-risk INNS arriving within the next 10 years, establishing and having an impact on biodiversity and ecosystems. We evaluated the success of this exercise in predicting arrival of these species within the subsequent 10 years. Ninety-two species were shortlisted in the 2013 horizon scan. In total, 31 of the 92 species identified in the 2013 horizon scan had arrived by 2023. We found that 12 of the top 20 species had arrived within 10 years. In predicting arrival, there was a significant effect of species having arrived previously to Great Britain, and the number of countries in Western Europe and Baltic countries in which an INNS was found prior to 2013. Policy implications: We conclude that horizon scanning provides a rapid, affordable and successful mechanism to predict the arrival of high-risk INNS. We highlight the importance of citizen science, including biological recording, and of local expertise for detecting and documenting arrival of INNS. We discuss knowledge gaps that could help inform and improve future horizon scanning. In addition, we recommend regularly repeating horizon scanning exercises to support biosecurity and awareness raising for INNS.
Oorspronkelijke taalEngels
TijdschriftJOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volumen/a
Exemplaarnummern/a
Pagina's (van-tot)e70217
ISSN0021-8901
DOI's
PublicatiestatusE-publicatie voorafgaand op geprinte versie - 5-dec-2025

Thematische Lijst 2020

  • Invasieve soorten

Vingerafdruk

Bekijk de onderzoeksthema's van 'Assessing the success of a horizon scanning approach in predicting invasive non-native species arrival'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Dit citeren