Vlaanderen.be

Research output

Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests : meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. / Paillet, Y; Bergès, L; Hjalén, J; Odor, P; Avon, C; Bernhardt - Römerman, M; Bijlsma, R. J; De Bruyn, Luc; Fuhr, M; Grandin, U; Kanka, R; Lundin, L; Luque, S; Magura, T; Matesanz, S; Mészaros, I; Sebastia, M. T; Schmidt, W; Standovar, T; Tothmérész, B; Uotik, A; Vallodares, F; Vellak, K; Virtanen, R.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2010, p. 101-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Paillet, Y, Bergès, L, Hjalén, J, Odor, P, Avon, C, Bernhardt - Römerman, M, Bijlsma, RJ, De Bruyn, L, Fuhr, M, Grandin, U, Kanka, R, Lundin, L, Luque, S, Magura, T, Matesanz, S, Mészaros, I, Sebastia, MT, Schmidt, W, Standovar, T, Tothmérész, B, Uotik, A, Vallodares, F, Vellak, K & Virtanen, R 2010, 'Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe', Conservation Biology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x

APA

Paillet, Y., Bergès, L., Hjalén, J., Odor, P., Avon, C., Bernhardt - Römerman, M., ... Virtanen, R. (2010). Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x

Author

Paillet, Y ; Bergès, L ; Hjalén, J ; Odor, P ; Avon, C ; Bernhardt - Römerman, M ; Bijlsma, R. J ; De Bruyn, Luc ; Fuhr, M ; Grandin, U ; Kanka, R ; Lundin, L ; Luque, S ; Magura, T ; Matesanz, S ; Mészaros, I ; Sebastia, M. T ; Schmidt, W ; Standovar, T ; Tothmérész, B ; Uotik, A ; Vallodares, F ; Vellak, K ; Virtanen, R. / Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests : meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. In: Conservation Biology. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 101-112.

Bibtex

@article{57c586b1a1bb4be9b92fabcfff8ff71c,
title = "Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe",
abstract = "Past and present pressures on forest resources have led to a drastic decrease in the surface area of unmanaged forests in Europe. Changes in forest structure, composition, and dynamics inevitably lead to changes in the biodiversity of forest-dwelling species. The possible biodiversity gains and losses due to forest management (i.e., anthropogenic pressures related to direct forest resource use), however, have never been assessed at a pan-European scale. We used meta-analysis to review 49 published papers containing 120 individual comparisons of species richness between unmanaged and managed forests throughout Europe. We explored the response of different taxonomic groups and the variability of their response with respect to time since abandonment and intensity of forest management. Species richness was slightly higher in unmanaged than in managed forests. Species dependent on forest cover continuity, deadwood, and large trees (bryophytes,lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles) and carabids were negatively affected by forest management. In contrast, vascular plant species were favored. The response for birds was heterogeneous and probably depended more on factors such as landscape patterns. The global difference in species richness between unmanaged and managed forests increased with time since abandonment and indicated a gradual recovery of biodiversity. Clearcut forests in which the composition of tree species changed had the strongest effect on species richness, but the effects of different types of management on taxa could not be assessed in a robust way because of low numbers of replications in the management-intensity classes. Our results show that some taxa are more affected by forestry than others, but there is a need for research into poorly studied species groups in Europe and in particular locations. Our meta-analysis supports the need for a coordinated European research network to study and monitor the biodiversity of different taxa in managed and unmanaged forests.",
author = "Y Paillet and L Berg{\`e}s and J Hjal{\'e}n and P Odor and C Avon and {Bernhardt - R{\"o}merman}, M and Bijlsma, {R. J} and {De Bruyn}, Luc and M Fuhr and U Grandin and R Kanka and L Lundin and S Luque and T Magura and S Matesanz and I M{\'e}szaros and Sebastia, {M. T} and W Schmidt and T Standovar and B Tothm{\'e}r{\'e}sz and A Uotik and F Vallodares and K Vellak and R Virtanen",
note = "Publication Authorstring : Paillet, Y.; Berg{\`e}s, L.; Hjal{\'e}n, J.; Odor, P.; Avon, C.; Bernhardt - R{\"o}merman, M.; Bijlsma, R.-J.; De Bruyn, L.; Fuhr, M.; Grandin, U.; Kanka, R.; Lundin, L.; Luque, S.; Magura, T.; Matesanz, S.; M{\'e}szaros, I.; Sebastia, M.T.; Schmidt, W.; Standovar, T.; Tothm{\'e}r{\'e}sz, B.; Uotik, A.; Vallodares, F.; Vellak, K.; Virtanen, R. Publication RefStringPartII : <i>Conservation Biology 24(1)</i>: 101-112. <a href={"}http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x{"} target={"}_blank{"}>dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x</a>",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "101--112",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests

T2 - meta-analysis of species richness in Europe

AU - Paillet, Y

AU - Bergès, L

AU - Hjalén, J

AU - Odor, P

AU - Avon, C

AU - Bernhardt - Römerman, M

AU - Bijlsma, R. J

AU - De Bruyn, Luc

AU - Fuhr, M

AU - Grandin, U

AU - Kanka, R

AU - Lundin, L

AU - Luque, S

AU - Magura, T

AU - Matesanz, S

AU - Mészaros, I

AU - Sebastia, M. T

AU - Schmidt, W

AU - Standovar, T

AU - Tothmérész, B

AU - Uotik, A

AU - Vallodares, F

AU - Vellak, K

AU - Virtanen, R

N1 - Publication Authorstring : Paillet, Y.; Bergès, L.; Hjalén, J.; Odor, P.; Avon, C.; Bernhardt - Römerman, M.; Bijlsma, R.-J.; De Bruyn, L.; Fuhr, M.; Grandin, U.; Kanka, R.; Lundin, L.; Luque, S.; Magura, T.; Matesanz, S.; Mészaros, I.; Sebastia, M.T.; Schmidt, W.; Standovar, T.; Tothmérész, B.; Uotik, A.; Vallodares, F.; Vellak, K.; Virtanen, R. Publication RefStringPartII : <i>Conservation Biology 24(1)</i>: 101-112. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x" target="_blank">dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x</a>

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Past and present pressures on forest resources have led to a drastic decrease in the surface area of unmanaged forests in Europe. Changes in forest structure, composition, and dynamics inevitably lead to changes in the biodiversity of forest-dwelling species. The possible biodiversity gains and losses due to forest management (i.e., anthropogenic pressures related to direct forest resource use), however, have never been assessed at a pan-European scale. We used meta-analysis to review 49 published papers containing 120 individual comparisons of species richness between unmanaged and managed forests throughout Europe. We explored the response of different taxonomic groups and the variability of their response with respect to time since abandonment and intensity of forest management. Species richness was slightly higher in unmanaged than in managed forests. Species dependent on forest cover continuity, deadwood, and large trees (bryophytes,lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles) and carabids were negatively affected by forest management. In contrast, vascular plant species were favored. The response for birds was heterogeneous and probably depended more on factors such as landscape patterns. The global difference in species richness between unmanaged and managed forests increased with time since abandonment and indicated a gradual recovery of biodiversity. Clearcut forests in which the composition of tree species changed had the strongest effect on species richness, but the effects of different types of management on taxa could not be assessed in a robust way because of low numbers of replications in the management-intensity classes. Our results show that some taxa are more affected by forestry than others, but there is a need for research into poorly studied species groups in Europe and in particular locations. Our meta-analysis supports the need for a coordinated European research network to study and monitor the biodiversity of different taxa in managed and unmanaged forests.

AB - Past and present pressures on forest resources have led to a drastic decrease in the surface area of unmanaged forests in Europe. Changes in forest structure, composition, and dynamics inevitably lead to changes in the biodiversity of forest-dwelling species. The possible biodiversity gains and losses due to forest management (i.e., anthropogenic pressures related to direct forest resource use), however, have never been assessed at a pan-European scale. We used meta-analysis to review 49 published papers containing 120 individual comparisons of species richness between unmanaged and managed forests throughout Europe. We explored the response of different taxonomic groups and the variability of their response with respect to time since abandonment and intensity of forest management. Species richness was slightly higher in unmanaged than in managed forests. Species dependent on forest cover continuity, deadwood, and large trees (bryophytes,lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles) and carabids were negatively affected by forest management. In contrast, vascular plant species were favored. The response for birds was heterogeneous and probably depended more on factors such as landscape patterns. The global difference in species richness between unmanaged and managed forests increased with time since abandonment and indicated a gradual recovery of biodiversity. Clearcut forests in which the composition of tree species changed had the strongest effect on species richness, but the effects of different types of management on taxa could not be assessed in a robust way because of low numbers of replications in the management-intensity classes. Our results show that some taxa are more affected by forestry than others, but there is a need for research into poorly studied species groups in Europe and in particular locations. Our meta-analysis supports the need for a coordinated European research network to study and monitor the biodiversity of different taxa in managed and unmanaged forests.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x

M3 - A1: Web of Science-article

VL - 24

SP - 101

EP - 112

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 1

ER -

Research output (related by authors)
Shopping cart
Add to cart Saved citations

Copy the text from this field...

Documents

Documents

  • Paillet_etal_2010_ConservBiol

    Final published version, 379 KB, PDF document

DOI

Relations
View graph of relations