Vlaanderen.be

Research output

Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-article

Authors

  • Francesco M. Sabatini
  • William S. Keeton
  • Marcus Lindner
  • Miroslav Svoboda
  • Pieter J. Verkerk
  • Jürgen Bauhus
  • Helge Bruelheide
  • Sabina Burrascano
  • Nicolas Debaive
  • Inês Duarte
  • Matteo Garbarino
  • Nikolaos Grigoriadis
  • Fabio Lombardi
  • Martin Mikoláš
  • Peter Meyer
  • Renzo Motta
  • Gintautas Mozgeris
  • Leónia Nunes
  • Péter Ódor
  • Momchil Panayotov
  • Alejandro Ruete
  • Bojan Simovski
  • Jonas Stillhard
  • Johan Svensson
  • Jerzy Szwagrzyk
  • Olli-Pekka Tikkanen
  • Roman Volosyanchuk
  • Tomas Vrska
  • Tzvetan Zlatanov
  • Tobias Kuemmerle

Departments, research groups and services

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volumen/a
Issue numbern/a
Number of pages17
ISSN1366-9516
Publication statusPublished - 15-Sep-2020

Abstract

Abstract Aims Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible. Location Europe. Methods We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe's forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection. Results We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two-thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non-primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities. Main conclusion Europe's primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU's “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike.

Thematic List 2020

EWI Biomedical sciences

Geographic list

Shopping cart
Add to cart Saved citations

Copy the text from this field...

Documents

Documents

Links

DOI

Relations
View graph of relations