Towards a Mature Age of Remote Sensing for Natura 2000 Habitat Conservation: Poor Method Transferability as a Prime Obstacle
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Contribution to book not published by INBO › Research › peer-review
- VLAAMSE INSTELLING VOOR TECHNOLOGISCH ONDERZOEK
|Title of host publication||The Roles of Remote Sensing in Nature Conservation : A Practical Guide and Case Studies|
|Editors||Ricardo Díaz-Delgado, Richard Lucas, Clive Hurford|
|Place of Publication||Cham, Switzerland|
|Publisher||Springer International Publishing AG|
|Publication status||Published - 9-Nov-2017|
Over the past decades, remote sensing has been repeatedly identified as a promising and powerful tool to aid nature conservation. Many methods and applications of remote sensing to monitor biodiversity have indeed been published, and continue to be at an increasing rate. As such, remote sensing is seemingly living up to its expectations; yet, its actual use in nature conservation (or rather the lack thereof) contradicts this. We argue that, at least for the practical implementation of regular vegetation monitoring, including within protected areas (e.g., European Natura 2000 sites), a lack of transferability of remote sensing methods is an overlooked factor that hinders its effective operational use for nature conservation. Among the causes of poor method transferability is the large variation in objects of interest, user requirements, ground reference data, and image properties, but also the lack of consideration of transferability during method development. To stimulate the adoption of remote sensing based techniques in vegetation monitoring and conservation, we recommend that a number of actions are taken. We call upon remote sensing scientists and nature monitoring experts to specifically consider and demonstrate method transferability by using widely available image data, limiting ground reference data dependence, and making their preferably open-source programming code publicly available. Furthermore, we recommend that nature conservation specialists are open and realistic about potential outcomes by not expecting the replacement of current in-place methodologies, and actively contributing to the thought process of generating transferable and repeatable methods.
We believe a new focus on method repeatability instead of novelty, would herald a mature era for remote sensing in nature conservation, in which remote sensing, through its operational use, would truly live up to its potential for nature conservation.
Research output (related by authors)
Research output: Contribution to journal › A1: Web of Science-article › Research › peer-review
Research output: Book/Report › Advices of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest › Research
Research output: Book/Report › Reports of Research Institute for Nature and Forest › Research
This is an official website of the Flemish government