Research output

Universal criteria for species conservation priorities? Findings from a survey of public views across Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-article


  • A Fischer
  • B Bednar-Friedl
  • F Langers
  • M Dobrovodská
  • N Geamana
  • K Skogen


Original languageEnglish
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)998–1007
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2011


Decisions on biodiversity management and conservation are increasingly based on indicators. These imply, explicitly or implicitly, a number of criteria such as nativeness, rarity, endangeredness and (economic) value. We investigated to which degree such criteria matter to members of the general public and conducted a survey in eight sites across Europe (n = 2378). We explored the relationships between perceived desirability of a species’ population increase and six species-related attributes, including previous population change, rarity, vulnerability, harmfulness, value, attractiveness, and nativeness. For all three species types investigated, previous population change, followed by perceived harmfulness and value, had the strongest relationship with desirability of future increase. Perceived nativeness played only a minor role in informing a species’ desirability. A strong relationship between previous change and desirability of future increase could also be found in a number of additional species and six different habitat types, suggesting that previous change is a key criterion that the general public draws on to inform their attitudes towards biodiversity management. We compare the roles of such criteria for the general public to those used in the scientific and political discourse, and draw conclusions for the use of indicators in the conservation debate, arguing that biodiversity management that is strongly focused on nativeness might fall short of the interests of the citizenship, whereas other criteria, such as population trends, harmfulness and role and value of a species in the ecosystem strongly resonate with the views of the general public.
Research output (related by authors)
  • Inleiding

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingContribution to Nature Reports of Research Institute for Nature and Forest

Shopping cart
Add to cart Saved citations

Copy the text from this field...



  • Fischer_etal_2011_BiolConserv

    Final published version, 0 bytes, PDF document


View graph of relations