Comparison of integrative nature conservation in forest policy in Europe: A qualitative pilot study of institutional determinants

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftA1: Web of Science-artikel


  • Tobias Schulz
  • Frank Krumm
  • Winfried Bücking
  • Georg Frank
  • Daniel Kraus
  • Marcus Lier
  • Marco Lovric
  • Marieke Vander Maaten
  • Yoan Paillet
  • jari Parviainen
  • Giorgio Vacchiano

Externe Organisaties

  • WSL, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
  • European Forest Institute - Central European Office
  • Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Baden-Württemberg
  • Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape
  • METLA, Finnish Forest Research Institute
  • Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald
  • Irstea
  • Universita` degi Studi di Torino, DISAFA


Originele taal-2Engels
TijdschriftBiodiversity and Conservation
Tijschrift nummer14
Pagina's (van-tot)3425-3450
Aantal pagina's26
StatusGepubliceerd - 2014


In this pilot study, we examine the relationship between the organisation of
property rights and the economic importance of forestry on the one hand and the degree to which integrative nature conservation is formally implemented in forest policy on the other hand. Further, we are interested in whether political institutions moderate this relationship.
We first offer a conceptualization of integrative nature conservation in forests and how to measure its implementation in law, ordinances and private agreements for a sample of European national and sub-national jurisdictions (Austria, Croatia, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Flanders, Baden-Wu¨rttemberg and Piedmont). We subsequently try to assess the implementation of these rules and to relate them both to the structural characteristics of forestry and to an appraisal of pluralism in forest policy. Our qualitative analysis reveals that among the jurisdictions with a more centralized and corporatist forest policy, integrative nature conservation in forests tend to be less formally implemented the more corporatism dominates decision-making. It also confirms the expectation that among the more consensual jurisdictions with a strong forestry sector, rules tend to be less formally implemented. Further, the suspicion prevails that in the latter case, such rules are either complemented with exceptions for private forests or higher compensation. A more
in-depth comparative examination is needed to further corroborate these findings

Thematische lijst

EWI Biomedische wetenschappen

Geografische lijst

Onderzoeksoutput (gerelateerd via auteurs)
Toevoegen aan winkelwagen Opgeslagen in winkelwagen

Kopieer de tekst uit dit veld...




Bekijk grafiek van relaties