Whip: Communicate and Test What to Expect from Data
Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschrift › A2: Artikel in een tijdschrift met peer review, dat niet inbegrepen is in A1 › Onderzoek
The ability to communicate and assess the quality and fitness for use of data is crucial to ensure maximum utility and re-use. Data consumers have certain requirements for the data they seek and need to be able to check if a data set conforms with these requirements. Data publishers aim to provide data with the highest possible quality and need to be able to identify potential errors that can be addressed with the available information at hand. The development and adoption of data publication guidelines is one approach to define and meet those requirements. However, the use of a guideline, the mapping decisions, and the requirements a dataset is expected to meet, are generally not communicated with the provided data. Moreover, these guidelines are typically intended for humans only. In this talk, we will present 'whip': a proposed syntax for data specifications. With whip, one can define column-based constraints for tabular (tidy) data using a number of rules, e.g. how data is structured following Darwin Core, how a term uses controlled vocabulary values, or what the expected minimum and maximum values are. These rules are human- and machine-readable, which communicates the specifications, and allows to automatically validate those in pipelines for data publication and quality assessment, such as Kurator. Whip can be formatted as a (yaml) text file that can be provided with the published data, communicating the specifications a dataset is expected to meet. The scope of these specifications can be specific to a dataset, but can also be used to express expected data quality and fitness for use of a publisher, consumer or community, allowing bottom-up and top-down adoption. As such, these specifications are complementary to the core set of data quality tests as currently under development by the TDWG Biodiversity Data Quality Task 2 Group 2. Whip rules are currently generic, but more specific ones can be defined to address requirements for biodiversity information.
Onderzoeksoutput (gerelateerd via auteurs)
Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschrift › A2: Artikel in een tijdschrift met peer review, dat niet inbegrepen is in A1 › Onderzoek › peer review
Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan congres › Paper/Powerpoint/Abstract › Onderzoek
Projecten (gerelateerd via auteurs)
This is an official website of the Flemish government